Press Release

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Critical Intervention Services (CIS) announces its partnership with Shorecrest Preparatory School in St. Petersburg, established for the purpose of implementing a novel and comprehensive national model for school safety, security, and protection beginning October 1, 2013. 

In 2011, CIS resolutely committed its resources to developing a new approach to managing school vulnerabilities and building a model based on practical, effective strategies for preventing school violence now and into the future. The result of years of research, analysis and program development, CIS’s comprehensive strategy is based on the intense study of actual, identified vulnerabilities and patterns of violence from school shooting events spanning nine decades and occuring not only in the US, but also in Russia and China. Factual analysis of these school shootings, both historical and present-day, has greatly impacted CIS’s model and helped shape its primary focus of effectively protecting schools from active shooters and other types of violence.    

To transition the program from model into motion, CIS began collaborating with Shorecrest in January of this year to implement its new public safety approach in pursuit of strengthening the safety, security, and protection of students and all members of the campus community. The CIS model mandates armed School Protection Officers (SPOs) on campus, upgrades and enhances procedures for all emergency alerts, and overall significantly fortifies the physical security of facilities and individuals within the campus.

Making school environments such as Shorecrest safer and more secure to better protect students, faculty, staff and all who volunteer or visit a school campus is CIS’s paramount interest. Consequently, CIS’s program is intended to create a national model that others can adopt and apply to meet their security needs. Toward that end, The John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York, a highly reputable institution instrumental in the Sandy Hook Newtown security review, is joining CIS in its endeavor to provide solid peer review and take lessons learned to other school systems and educational institutions to benefit from shared knowledge and implementation of the CIS model. 

Critical Intervention Services has pioneered many innovative methodologies and services within the realm of private sector led public safety and enjoys a long history of developing unique and effective solutions to complex security problems. Although universities, private and public schools, and many public venues have relied on the presence of armed officers for decades, CIS has developed a methodology that employs highly trained armed officers working with tools and skill sets not typically used in conjunction with school or campus environment security. CIS’s threat assessment methodology and approach far exceeds the norm of present-day school security measures. From the hiring process to personnel matching to training, education, and placement in the field, CIS’s methodology focuses on prevention of school violence and exacts great care and effort from every SPO officer. 

Combating school violence is no longer something to ponder or debate. It is simply a reality that must be expertly managed both proactively and during a crisis. CIS’s new public safety model for school environments is specifically tailored to counter and control the complex issues inherent in protecting one of our nation’s most precious assets – our schools.  

RFP Cover letter
  • CIS’s advanced technology and operational support infrastructure including our 24-hour Operations Center and proprietary information management and communications systems designed to support activities ranging from reporting and dispatch to Homeland Security intelligence and interagency investigations work to ensure officer safety and mitigate client liability. 

  • Our extensive experience in critical infrastructure protection in a range of roles including protective services, consulting (vulnerability assessments, security planning, etc.), and in-depth understanding of regulatory compliance requirements with NERC, MTSA, and other statutory regulations puts us in a position to assist clients in essential ways other agencies are simply incapable of doing. 
 
  • CIS’s extensive experience in mass deployments for natural disasters and special heightened risk events, including an unparalleled infrastructure for conducting unsupported, self-sustaining operations in even the most dire of environments, assures our clients immediate and expert support in times of crisis. 

For more than two decades, CIS has earned a worldwide reputation for developing, implementing and integrating innovative and effective solutions to security and public safety challenges for all types of clients, but especially those in complex risk environments. As professionals, our clients count on us to get it right. We take safety and security seriously and providing the best protection in every environment we have the privilege to touch is our paramount objective. 

The bottom line is perhaps best stated by TECO’s Director of Corporate Security and Emergency Management in his letter of recommendation on behalf of CIS: “In the final analysis, the relationship between a security provider and their client is founded in trust. Trust that only the finest security operatives available will be deployed on your property; trust that the provider will do what is necessary to weave themselves into the very fabric of their client’s organization, blending their services into the culture and operational guidelines established by the client.” Going forward, CIS stands ready to support OUC and work in collaboration with OUC’s security team to build trust, achieve cohesiveness and expertly address and manage every safety and security need now present and those that will undoubtedly arise in the future.  

Thank you for the opportunity to submit our response to OUC’s RFP for security services and for your thoughtful consideration of our proposal. 

Sincerely,


KC Poulin
CEO, Critical Intervention Services, Inc.
Buyer of Record
Orlando Utilities Commission
Reliable Plaza
Attn: 1st Floor Security Guard
100 West Anderson Street
Orlando, FL 32801

Mr. Dickey:

Enclosed please find our proposal for security services for the Orlando Utilities Commission as set forth in RFP15-3929 OQ. Critical Intervention Services, Inc. (CIS) is pleased to outline our experience and qualifications and present an overview of our agency’s expertise, capabilities and resources for your consideration of CIS as the most responsive and responsible firm offering the greatest advantage to OUC.  

Effectively protecting critical infrastructure facilities is no ordinary security assignment. 
CIS brings more than a decade of experience working in partnership with critical infrastructure client organizations to tailor every aspect of our services to meet their heightened security needs. Every day we strive to enhance safety at facilities and sites responsible for providing assets vital to the public’s wellbeing.

The longevity we’ve enjoyed and continue to enjoy with countless clients throughout nearly twenty-four years of business speaks not only to our dedication to providing each and every client with the highest quality, most professional security services available, but also to our drive to produce lasting, solid security solutions. CIS’s success is attributable to a combination of factors that give CIS the edge clients will find in no other agency. The expertise of our executive, leadership and command staff, the rigor of our candidate selection requirements, the superior training and professional development of our practitioners, our use of the best technology, our strict adherence to extensive standard operating procedures and our proven methodology all go unrivaled by other security providers.  

CIS brings a multitude of benefits to the table – both value added and optional enhancement in nature – that our competitors cannot. Please allow us to spotlight here just a few advantages singular to our organization. They are representative of our outstanding strengths and our duly earned reputation as an industry leader:

  • From prerequisites to post-hiring mandatory testing and ongoing evaluation, CIS has the most stringent employee selection process and training requirements of any security agency in Florida. 

  • Our unmatched quality controls such as our 300+ page CIS Standard Operating Procedures Manual, CIS Doctrine, special professional development opportunities and incentives for officers, formal leadership training, and more serve to assure our clients of our commitment to placing only the most qualified officers on their property.  

administrative legal/business writing

Petition for Variance

         I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing Petition has been furnished to the Joint Administrative Procedures Committee, Room 680, Pepper Building, 111 W. Madison St., Tallahassee, FL 32399 on this 14 day of October, 2015.

Elizabeth Greer, Esq.
Florida Bar No. 176664
The Safety and Intelligence Institute, Inc.
In-House Counsel
13777 Belcher Road South
Largo, FL 33771
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, DIVISION OF LICENSING

Section 120.542, Florida Statutes, authorizes agencies to grant variances to rule requirements if the person subject to the rule demonstrates that the purpose of the underlying statute will be or has been achieved by other means by the person, and when application of a rule creates a substantial hardship or violates principles of fairness. §120.542(2), Fla. Stat.

Rule 5N-1.140(1)(b), Florida Administrative Code, requires two final examinations be given, one at the end of each of the two required security officer training courses. Petitioner’s request to vary the rule so as to schedule examinations at various intervals within each course, while still providing the same number of exam questions, meets the underlying requirement of Chapter 493, Florida Statutes, to promote public protection by ensuring that security officers receive training consistent with statutory and rule requirements.

Petitioner has established that adhering to the two, one hour final exam requirement in Rule 5N-1.140(1)(b), Florida Administrative Code, creates a substantial economic hardship by limiting
IN RE: The Safety & Intelligence Institute, Inc.
       License numbers DS9800005, DS1000013, DS2700045 

PETITION FOR VARIANCE FROM FLA. ADMIN. CODE R. 5N-1.140(1)(c)

Petitioner, The Safety & Intelligence Institute, pursuant to Section 120.542, Florida Statutes and Fla. Admin. Code R. 28-104, hereby petitions for a variance from Fla. Admin. Code R. 5N-1.140(1)(c) and states as follows:
Background
1.  Petitioner is The Safety & Intelligence Institute, Inc., a Florida corporation that also operates under other registered trade names (collectively the "S2 Institute"), headquartered at 13777 Belcher Road South, Largo, Florida 33771, telephone, 727-461-9417, facsimile, 727-449-1269. 

2.  The S2 Institute is licensed to provide instruction to security officers under Section 493.6301(7), Florida Statutes, and is therefore subject to the regulations of Section 493, Florida Statutes, and Fla. Admin. Code R. 5N-1.140(1)(a) requiring a particular amount of course training hours and curriculum, (b) requiring testing on that curriculum and (c) requiring a threshhold passing score upon examination of the curriculum.

3.  On December 23, 2014, the S2 Institute petitioned for a permanent variance from the testing restrictions imposed by Rule 5N-1.140(1)(b) that limit testing of the required curriculum to a total of two examinations, such that throughout instruction of the required curriculum, the S2 Institute may administer examinations at various intervals.

4.  On January 28, 2015, the Department entered its Order Granting Petition for Variance (herein after, “Order”) stating the following conclusions of law: 
9.  As set forth in Section 493.6100, Florida Statutes: The Legislature recognizes that the private security, investigative, and recovery industries are rapidly expanding fields that require regulation to ensure that the interests of the public will be adequately served and protected. The Legislature recognizes that untrained persons, unlicensed persons or businesses, or persons or businesses, or persons who are not of good moral character engaged in the private security, investigative, and recovery industries are a threat to the welfare of the public if placed in positions of trust. Regulation of licensed and unlicensed persons and businesses engaged in these fields is therefore deemed necessary. 

As set forth in Section 493.6104, Florida Statutes: The department shall adopt rules necessary to administer this chapter. However, no rule shall be adopted that unreasonably restricts competition or the availability of services requiring licensure pursuant to this chapter.

As set forth in Section 493.6303(4)(a), Florida Statutes: Effective January 1, 2012, an applicant for a Class “D” license must submit proof of successful completion of a minimum of 40 hours of professional training at a school or training facility licensed by the department.

10.  The variance requested herein will serve the pupose of the underlying statute in the following ways: (1) it makes no change to the statutory recognition that untrained persons engaging in the private security industry pose a threat to the welfare of the public if placed in positions of trust and supports the testing mandate in furtherance of that statutory safeguard; (2) it does not alter the statutory requirement that an applicant for a Class “D” license must submit proof of successful completion of the requisite number of hours of professional training; and (3) it invites the Department to encourage competition and the availability of services requiring licensure under Chapter 493.
Petitioner’s competitiveness in the marketplace. Granting this variance would therefore meet the additional legislative goal to not unreasonably restrict competition or the availability of services requiring Chapter 493 licensure, as required by Section 493.6104, Florida Statutes.
Specific Facts Which Demonstrate Substantial Hardship That Justify Variance
8.  Implementation of the (1)(b) variance granted to S2 by the Department necessarily requires a variance from the (1)(c) scoring criteria requiring two separate scores, one for Course A and one for Course B. Rule 5N-1.140(1)(c) requires 75 out of 100 questions be answered correctly on the Course A examination, which is equal to a 75% pass rate, and it requires 53 out of 70 questions be answered correctly on the Course B examination, which is equal to a 75.7% pass rate. Inasmuch as a variance permitting S2 to score Course A and Course B as a whole with a pass rate of 76% does not reduce the passing percentage score, denial of S2’s petition would impede S2’s ability to utilize its (1)(b) variance and would thus result in the same negative economic impact on S2 previously recognized by the Department as a substantial hardship. Additionally, the inability to score Course A and Course B examinations on an overall scale also constitutes “other type of hardship” as contemplated under Section 120.542(2), Florida Statutes, as denial of the (1)(c) variance would result in S2’s inability to utilize the (1)(b) variance. Such inability would undermine both the spirit and the letter of the Department’s January 28, 2015 Order.
No more than 50 percent of the questions in each subject area may be true or false questions, and 75 or more questions in Course A and 53 questions in Course B answered correctly is a passing score…
The Applicable Rule
5.  Fla. Admin. Code R. 5N-1.140(1)(c) provides in relevant part:
Statute Implemented
6.  Rule 5N-1.140(1)(c) implements Section 493.6100, 493.6103 and 493.6303(4)(a), Florida Statutes, and has, as its specific authority, Section 493.6103, Florida Statutes.
Type of Action Requested
7.  The S2 Institute is requesting a variance from the scoring criteria set out in Rule 5N-1.140(1)(c) establishing that 75 or more questions in Course A and 53 questions in Course B answered correctly is a passing score. The S2 Institute requests said variance to allow the scores of all examinations administered under the Order to be aggregated and 76% of the questions answered correctly be considered a passing score. The requested percentage amounts to an equal (for Course A) or greater (for Course B) percentage of correct answers presently required by (1)(c).
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The Requested Variance Will Serve the Purpose of the Underlying Statute
WHEREFORE, The S2 Institute requests the Department grant a permanent variance to Rule 5N-1.140(1)(c) to allow the scores of all examinations administered under the Order to be aggregated and 76% of the questions answered correctly be considered a passing score. 
Respectfully submitted,

company newsletter

Major Mark Puetz, now a ten-year veteran of CIS, has a few call signs under his belt. A former U.S. Marine and one time CIS Echo, Bravo, Sierra, Command, and Delta, you can bet his boots flaunt mud. Now the Director of Risk Management and Professional Standards at CIS for eight years, if you’ve never met Major Puetz, don’t fret, that’s a good thing. If you don’t ever want to meet him, that’s even better! Avoiding a visit to his office is a smart move. But, if you don’t know much about him, that’s about to change. 

For a decade, Major Puetz has been instrumental in shaping CIS – from the field to the classroom to the boardroom – he has been a dedicated, valuable, and very proactive member of the CIS team. For his ability, knowledge, leadership and integrity, CEO KC Poulin is pleased to announce Major Puetz’s promotion to Director of Risk Management and Professional Standards – a title duly earned. At the CEO’s request, I sat down with Mark to find out a bit about him in order to share some of his history and his climb up the CIS ranks. What I found out is that it makes a lot of sense that Mark has excelled at CIS.   

Mark grew up in central Ohio and studied criminology and philosophy at The Ohio State University in Columbus. Not your average freshman, Mark had direction from the beginning, his interest being law enforcement. “I never had any sympathy for predators,” he declared. “I wanted to be part of a team involved in keeping them off the streets,” he said with conviction. Criminology classes taught Mark to think about criminals and their actions in terms of “why,” rather than “what happened,” and philosophy classes taught him how to understand thought processes – they taught him to think about thinking.  

In case it all sounds a bit too bookish, here’s something that might surprise you. Amid the intellectual rigor and stimulating culture in which he was admittedly blissfully submersed, Mark enlisted in the Marine Corps. He went through boot camp and completed his bachelor’s degree as part of a commissioning program, and drilled with a reserve unit during college. The Marine Corps experiences Mark describes are clearly meaningful and lasting: sniper school, noncommissioned officer school, Marine Corps leadership, Paris Island, drill and ceremonies, PT, the brotherhood, the camaraderie. During his enlistment, Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait and the Gulf War heated up. It was war on new territory – the desert – so he got to experiment with all sorts of new military gear. “We were doing anti-terrorism before anti-terrorism was cool,” he recalled with a grin.  

After leaving the military, Mark went home to Ohio to “think” about a new direction. That took him down a path or two. He held some typical security jobs, a couple of summer jobs as camp counselor, and “worked” as a wilderness guide in the Adirondack Mountains which led to a job working with seriously at risk youth in an outdoor environment in Pennsylvania. Mark liked the philosophy of the program because it centered around alternative approaches to imprisonment and helped change the lives of troubled youths. Mark’s journey then led him to Florida’s Department of Juvenile Justice where the program he became part of exposed him to intricate details and insight into youth gang life. He began to study youth gangs and decided he would be limited in that field without an advanced degree. He wanted something versatile and he chose USF’s MBA program for that very reason – so he could go in any direction. 

In 1998, Mark hung out his own shingle and started a consulting business. He wanted to use analytical thought processes to help struggling business owners find their vision and establish direction for their companies (a healthy combination of his education and experience). While getting his business established, he looked for a night job and eventually spotted an ad for employment at CIS. Soon he became more involved with what he was doing at CIS and the methodology he was implementing and eventually gave CIS his full-time attention. Working at CIS was akin to what he aimed to do when he studied criminology and worked in programs designed to help juvenile delinquents.

Mark’s career at CIS began in the field as an Echo like everyone else, and while his military background provided the tactical experience for the job, his background working with delinquent juveniles gave him the street awareness he needed to work with different properties and engage with residents. From the get-go Mark was constantly looking for ways to understand things and make them work better in ways that made sense. Even as an Echo he would actually analyze the properties he patrolled for their strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. And, knowing they would reveal a bigger picture, he tracked his findings. He maintained spreadsheets tracking every violation notice or trespass warning issued, of every suspicious person or vehicle, or every piece of intelligence that he did not yet fully understand. He was right, and before long, patterns started to emerge in the data. As he shared his discoveries and thoughts, his superiors took notice. After a year or two he was called in-house where he was given various projects involving breaking something down and using analytical thought processes to rebuild it into something better, something more effective or efficient. Over the years, Mark has engaged in improving the quality of processes and programs in virtually every department and aspect of CIS – hiring, training, accounting, HR, management, operations, and the list goes on. Now, if a system needs to be rethought, Mark is the go to person.








For his efforts he was promoted to Senior Master Sergeant and started doing more and more of these types of tasks in multiple departments and soon wound up as Deputy Commander working very closely with the Chief. Along the way, he started communicating with insurance adjusters and attorneys and was progressively given more and more responsibilities. In 2006, the executive staff decided to rewrite CIS’ standard operating procedures. It started out as a small, group effort project, but once Mark “did his thing on it,” it became a precedent setting project resulting in a 300 page SOP manual rivaling those used in law enforcement agencies. Recognizing connectivity with the officers was waning because the organization was growing so significantly, the group set out to ensure they had a “tool to let officers know what we expect,” he said of the task. Mark described the SOP manual as “part treatise, part manual, part culture.” “It is meant to guide [officers] and help them understand what CIS is all about,” he explained. In 2009, the manual was finally published. Mark was an integral part of that major accomplishment and he received the CEO Coin in recognition of his hard work. 

Mark’s has been an ever-evolving job that has often been reshaped and redefined over the last ten years. The Risk Management and Professional Standards Department was established right before the SOP rewrite began. Mark was given the rank of Major. Today, that department manages lawsuits, worker’s compensation, internal affairs investigations and professional standards, and maintains relations with the Division of Licensing, the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, law enforcement, and much more. The responsibility is tremendous and of great importance, especially to an agency that places so much emphasis on maintaining integrity and leadership in the industry.

So, what keeps Mark at CIS? Part of what keeps him here he says is “the methodology and working with how it can best be deployed.” For Mark it goes back to alternative approaches, breaking stuff apart, and rigorous thought process. You will recall he liked those things about his criminology and philosophy studies, and he gets it all at CIS. “CCBPI is an alternative approach and it is effective for getting rid of predators,” he remarked. And “disagreements,” among commanders, he says, “are usually only about how to do it best.” He likes that. “Quality processes are key to substantial growth,” he advises, and “improving the quality of our programs is all about analytical thought processes.” Through creations of his own and through those of others at CIS, Mark has seen “tremendous improvements and a lot of growth and change” over the years.  

His best advice when it comes to new ideas? “Never marry an idea. Count on it getting thrown out there and getting beat up, but something will get implemented.” From Echo to Executive, Mark has been casting ideas, scrutinizing systems and helping shape CIS into the industry leader it has become. His work is both commendable and representative of the remarkable career paths CIS has to offer. Mark is the first member of command staff to be promoted to such a top-ranking position and CIS is proud of both this pinnacle he has reached and the opportunity to help him achieve it. Going forward, Mark will, without a doubt, put a great deal of thought into his new role as Director, set the bar high, and, of course, continue the processes!   










Major Mark Puetz Joins CIS’ Top Ranks 

Employee spotlight

marketing brochure

With Tagline

recruitment brochure